Indian captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni looks skywards whilst station subsequent to The ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 prize during a M. Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bangalore Feb 2011. World Cup winning captain Kapil Dev batted for India’s under-fire bowlers after they roughly let England run divided with a pass diversion during a weekend.
©AFP/File – Indranil Mukherjee
NEW DELHI (AFP) – World Cup winning captain Kapil Dev upon Wednesday batted for India’s under-fire bowlers after they roughly let England run divided with a pass diversion during a weekend.
India’s inclusive batsmen piled up a huge 338 in Sunday’s strife in Bangalore though a bowlers were unprotected upon a prosaic track, permitting England to fist out a stirring tie.
India’s bowling conflict was additionally found wanting in a opener opposite Bangladesh who took a quarrel to their fanciful rivals by roughly in contact with a 300-run mark.
“Our bowling was not up to a standards (in a initial dual matches),” Dev was quoted as observant by a Press Trust of India headlines agency.
“But if a bowlers have fared feeble in a initial dual matches, it doesn’t meant which they have been not great sufficient to take wickets.
“In a final dual years, these have been a bowlers who have won most matches for India with their great show. So we unequivocally do not wish to criticize them,” pronounced Dev who guided India to their usually World Cup feat in 1983.
The former all-rounder however combined India should have won a diversion opposite England.
“To a sure extent, a critique is warranted. Even after scoring 338, we should have not mislaid or scored equally a game.
“Somebody scores a great hundred as well as we post a great sum of 338 upon house as well as afterwards we come out with a tie, it’s not ideal. In my opinion, England won which match.
“They played improved cricket than India.”
Dev additionally corroborated skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni who had bloody a Umpire Decision Review System over a argumentative statute upon England batsman Ian Bell.
“If we have done a mistake, we can’t unequivocally shift it. Either a third referee should contend not out or out. You can’t chuck a preference behind to a on-field umpire. That is unethical.
“Dhoni is scold in a way. When we have a law it is not required which everybody should similar to it.”
India’s Yuvraj Singh suspicion he had Bell lbw upon examination for 17, with replays display a round would have strike a stumps.
Bell had proposed to travel off though since New Zealand referee Billy Bowden’s outcome was not out, a preference was returned to him by Australian replay central Rod Tucker as well as a Kiwi deemed Bell to be as well distant down a pitch.
No comments:
Post a Comment